|
|
|
|
|
|
Members Only
Inquiry Team GuideOverviewInquiry Teams drive the process of grant project identification and selection. In the course of this work, they drive significant learning for Full Circle members. Inquiry Teams operate autonomously and have great freedom to define their own way of working, but they are accountable for deliverables at several points in the process. This helps to ensure that the process moves forward at a suitable pace and provides the organization with an opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of each team's work. The key organizational function of Inquiry Teams is to identify the grantees (and, more specifically, the grant projects) that Full Circle Fund supports. Such support is not automatic; Inquiry Teams' recommendations are reviewed by the membership of the Impact Circle at large, which votes on them. In the end, grants endorsed by a vote of the Impact Circle are approved or rejected by the Board of Full Circle Fund. Goals for each Grant Cycle Inquiry Team
Summary of grant cycle roles: Grant Inquiry Team Leader: Grant Cycle Director: Circle Chair: Grant Cycle Advisors: Advice for Inquiry TeamsThe General Flow...In general, most Inquiry Teams tend to approach their work by narrowing in on it:
Some Specific Best Practices
Grant Cycle Meetings (Milestones!)These meetings an important part of the inquiry process for Inquiry Teams and an important part of the decision process for the Impact Circle at large. It is in the interest of every inquiry team to be well-presented at these meetings, because ultimately the Education Circle will choose grant projects in part based on its assessment of the capabilities of the team making the proposal. Kickoff Meeting - Form Inquiry Teams At this meeting, Inquiry Teams will be defined based on clusters of interest and energy among the members present. The new inquiry teams will make some minor progress "live" at this meeting, but mostly will set the stage for the work ahead. Preliminary Findings and Refined Focus Each inquiry group will present initial findings to the group at this meeting. By this meeting it is expected that Inquiry Teams will have refined their focus and will be able to present a lucid description of the questions they are pursuing (and how they are already doing so.) What are you reading to develop team knowledge? Where are you getting advice? It is not expected that each group will have a well-baked list of potential grantees at this point. Part of the purpose of the meeting will be for the group at large to provide feedback and advice in this area. Nominations Meeting Each Inquiry Team presents its final list of possible grantees for feedback from the Impact Circle at large. At this point it is not expected that projects have been defined. It is expected that there be no more than four finalists at this point. This is a working meeting. Proposals by Finalists All the finalist candidate organizations present their proposals on one evening (along with the Full Circle sponsor/advocate, which will be a member of the Inquiry Team). It is expected that the Full Circle Fund members will work with final candidate organizations to prepare these proposals, including a lot of the "heavy lifting" of preparing the documents. Due to highly diligent and effective haranguing by the Grant Cycle Director, a document with a specified structure and format detailing each proposal is sent out at least a full weekend before the meeting for pre-reading. (The Grant Cycle Director may determine that a web-based solution for document presentation is preferable.) At the meeting, there will not be time for Q&A, so we will utilize the "question blast" format - questions from the Impact Circle will be asked and recorded, but not answered. Answers to the questions will be developed after the meeting and shared either in written form or in a recorded voice conference. Members are encouraged to take notes, specifically considering each grant project candidate with Full Circle Fund's grant criteria in mind. Decision Meeting At this meeting, Full Circle member advocates will recap the proposals, identifying the leads and team members that have committed to work on the project if approved. (A member leader and at least two additional committed members is a prerequisite for taking any proposal to ballot.) Projects will be put to secret ballot, and members will be encouraged to vote "no" without guilt if they think a project is ill-conceived for any reason. Allocation of dollars to grant projects is the Board's responsibility. The Chair, with advice and counsel from the Grant Cycle Director and the newly identified Project Leads, crafts a balanced budget to recommend to the Board for swift action. |
|||||
Copyright 2008 Full Circle Fund